Пропустить переходы по меню

В настоящее время данная страница на вашем языке отсутствует. Вы можете просмотреть результат машинного перевода, полученный с использованием опции Google Translate. Мы не несем ответственности за предоставление этой услуги, и результаты перевода нами не проверяются.
Если вам требуется помощь, просим вас связаться с нами.

SEEG – Overcoming the challenge of refractory seizures

Refractory epilepsy is clinically determined by response to anti-epileptic medications, age at onset, and seizure frequency, and can severely affect quality of life, with a significant effect on neuronal development1. Failure to successfully manage epileptic episodes in children can severely impact not only the social development of the child but also the wellbeing of their support network2. The additional time and resources required to manage the long-term programme for paediatric patients with such complex needs results in additional pressures on healthcare workers from clinicians and neurosurgeons through to hospital managers. These increase the need for earlier, more targeted interventions.

The route to seizure freedom

Surgical resection offers an alternative approach that can provide better seizure control or ultimately, lead to seizure freedom in a subset of focal epilepsy patients that are typically refractory to standard pharmacological treatment.

Accurately identifying the epileptogenic zones is critical to the success of resection procedures.

While several intracranial electroencephalography (IEEG) methods exist, minimally-invasive surgical solutions, such as SEEG, offer numerous benefits in comparison to alternative methods such as subdural electrode (SDE) implantations (Table 1).

Table 1. A comparison between SEEG and SDE. Table adapted from Fiani et al. (2021)3

SEEG

SDE

Invasiveness and safety

  • Minimised intra-operative and postoperative blood loss

  • Increased risk of CSF leaks and postoperative issues

Efficiency

  • Electrode removal after monitoring in <15 minutes

  • Reduced hospital stay duration.
  • Lower cost of care

  • Patients require two craniotomies: for placement and for extraction.
  • Longer hospital stay
  • Increased care costs

Efficacy

  • Seizure control is more effective than SDE

  • Seizure control is lower compared to SEEG

Dixi Microdeep electrode











DIXI MICRODEEP depth electrodes are single-use, multi-contact flexi-rigid intracerebral electrodes, manufactured using the gold standard platinum-iridium for superior smooth recording.

The success of SEEG in investigative and therapeutic procedures is increasingly influenced by innovative robotic technologies and depth electrodes.

Electrodes such as MICRODEEP® by DIXI medical, allow for deep, active bilateral exploration of the brain; with depths ranging from 16 mm to 80.5 mm, they can reach areas that are normally inaccessible during IEEG. In addition, the electrodes can be used to disorganise the epileptogenic zone, offering an alternative treatment route for children ineligible for surgery.

Clinical evidence in different applications

The use of depth electrodes during SEEG has expanded the repertoire of tools for diagnosing and treating refractory seizures in children with considerable success in several areas:

Insula/operculum (I/O) exploration4,5

Seizures originating in the I/O cortex can manifest heterogeneously as well as share characteristics with seizures originating in other lobes. Consequently, detecting and recording seizures that originate from the I/O cortex can be challenging. Without accurate recognition of the epileptogenic zone, in particular those that originate deep in the brain, the risk of a poor outcome is greatly increased. However, using the minimally-invasive SEEG with depth electrodes, clinicians have successfully identified that in around 64 per cent of SEEG cases, seizures originate in the I/O.

Epileptogenicity mapping6

One of the simplest approaches for investigating and delineating the epileptogenic zones is to map the activation level, as evidenced by changes in gamma activity, of each IEEG contact. Using SEEG and depth electrodes, variations in neural activity during a seizure can be quantified allowing for more accurate micro-resection.

Radiofrequency thermocoagulation7

In addition to identifying areas for surgical resection, depth electrodes can also be used in the treatment of refractory seizures. Creating small focal lesions that disrupt the epileptogenic zone using radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) has been shown to reduce seizure frequency and, in some cases, lead to complete seizure freedom. According to a particular study7, of patients not eligible for surgical resection, three (13.6%) were seizure-free and six (27.3%) were significantly improved after radiofrequency thermocoagulation.

The benefits of this approach are that depth electrodes are directly targeted to the epileptogenic zone and RFTC is applied during the SEEG procedure thereby eliminating the need for repeat procedures.

Summary

Identifying epileptogenic zones in children with refractory epilepsy has its challenges, with many of the methods requiring invasive procedures that increase intra- and post-operative complications.

SEEG offers a minimally invasive approach that can be successfully harnessed in the identification and treatment of paediatric refractory seizures, thanks to the effective placement of intracranial DIXI depth electrodes.

Renishaw offers cutting edge solutions that facilitate the identification of epileptogenic zones for tailored resection surgery in patients with refractive epilepsy.

References

  1. McCoy, B., Benbadis, S. (2010). Approach to refractory childhood seizures. Therapy. 7:497-506. Accessed at https://www.openaccessjournals.com/articles/approach-to-refractory-childhood-seizures.pdf
  2. Dallas, J., Englot, D. J., Naftel, R, P. (2020). Neurosurgical approaches to pediatric epilepsy: Indications, techniques, and outcomes of common surgical procedures, Seizure, 77:76-85, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2018.11.007
  3. Fiani, B., Jarrah, R., Doan, T., Shields, J., Houston, R., & Sarno, E. (2021). Stereoelectroencephalography versus Subdural Electrode Implantation to Determine Whether Patients with Drug-resistant Epilepsy Are Candidates for Epilepsy Surgery. Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 61(6):347–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2020-0361
  4. Kappen, P., Eltze, C., Tisdall, M., Cross, H, J., Thornton, R., Moeller, F. (2020) Stereo-EEG exploration in the insula/operculum in paediatric patients with refractory epilepsy, Seizure, 78:63-70, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2020.02.011
  5. Bottan, J, S., Rubino, P, A., Lau, J, C, MacDougall, K, W, Parrent, A, G., Burneo, J, G., Steven, D,A. (2020) Robot-Assisted Insular Depth Electrode Implantation Through Oblique Trajectories: 3-Dimensional Anatomical Nuances, Technique, Accuracy, and Safety. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 18(3):278-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz154
  6. Ayoubian, L., Tadel, F., David, O. (2020) Epileptogenicity Mapping: A Quantitative Approach to Identify the Seizure Onset, Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 31(3):449-457, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2020.03.006
  7. Chipaux, M., Taussig, D., Dorfmuller, G., Dorison, N., Tisdall, M, M., Boyd, S, G., Thornton, R., Eltze, C., Fohlen, M., Cross, H, J., Ferrand-Sorbets, S. (2019) SEEG-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation of epileptic foci in the paediatric population: Feasibility, safety and efficacy, Seizure, 70:63-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2019.07.004

Renishaw Neuro Solutions Limited – Legal and Privacy Notices. Click here